Parks not mandatory to increase happiness

[Newtz]

But really tho, a park every few tiles isn't really realistic. Pepole irl wouldnt even care if there were 5 parks at their neighborhood

[_Rock Fort_]

That depends . On large cities , with high density and not a lot of gardens its useful for habitants . But in contryside , which a lot of people have there own gardens , i'm more agree , but parks could be helpful to for tourists .

[cesareborgia94]

Maybe small gardens could add nature influence instead of parks. Or maybe just act as a decor.

Irl it depends, some don't care about parks, some probably due care about parks. Its a matter of utility. If a park provides sightseeing and eyecandy for the public, aka acts to beautify the surroundings, maybe it could make people happier.

It depends on the perspective of different people. I see parks as something to make the surroundings a bit beautiful, aka as an eyecandy or decoration.

[Newtz]

I think the parks could be replacements for low nature influence in the city, and "Nature" is the one that is going to increase happiness